Comparison of Production Processes, Advantages, and Disadvantages Among PVC, PU, and TPU Leathers

2025-07-26
Comparison of Production Processes, Advantages, and Disadvantages Among PVC, PU, and TPU Leathers

I. Production Process Comparison

1. PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) Artificial Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: PVC resin, plasticizers (e.g., DOP/DBP), stabilizers, fillers, colorants.
Basic process: Raw material mixing → Plasticization → Calendering or coating → Laminating with base fabric → Foaming (optional) → Embossing → Surface treatment → Cooling → Winding.
Key processes:


  • Calendering method: PVC material is rolled into a film using a multi-roller calender, then laminated with a base fabric.

  • Coating method: PVC paste is directly spread onto the base fabric and heated in an oven to form a solid film.

2. PU (Polyurethane) Artificial Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: Polyester/polyether polyol, MDI/TDI, DMF solvent, additives.
Basic process:


  • Wet process: Base fabric is dipped → Coated with PU slurry → Immersed in a coagulation bath (DMF-H₂O) → Washed → Dried → Surface-treated.

  • Dry process: Release paper is coated → Dried → Laminated with base fabric → Cured → Peeled off → Post-treated.
    Key differences:

  • Wet PU has good breathability, so it’s often used for high-end shoes and clothing.

  • Dry PU offers diverse surface effects, making it popular for bags and furniture.

3. TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) Leather Production Process

Main raw materials: TPU granules (polyester or polyether type), additives.
Basic process:


  • Extrusion casting method: TPU is melted and extruded → Rolled into a film → Laminated with base fabric → Embossed → Cooled and shaped.

  • Blow molding method: TPU is melted and blown into a film → Combined with base material → Post-treated.

  • Coating method: TPU granules are dissolved, then coated → Dried and cured.

II. Performance Advantages and Disadvantages Analysis

PVC Artificial Leather

Advantages:


  • Lowest cost; raw materials are easy to obtain.

  • Mature production process; simple to process.

  • Good resistance to acids, alkalis, and weather.

  • Can be made into various colors and patterns.


Disadvantages:


  • Plasticizers easily migrate, causing hardening and brittleness.

  • Poor breathability; feels stiff.

  • Weak low-temperature performance (prone to cracking).

  • Poor environmental friendliness (contains chlorine; may have heavy metals).

  • Short service life (usually 2–3 years).

PU Artificial Leather

Advantages:


  • Feels closer to genuine leather: soft and elastic.

  • Better breathability and moisture permeability than PVC.

  • Good abrasion and flex resistance.

  • More biodegradable than PVC.

  • Diverse varieties (e.g., microfiber, suede-like).


Disadvantages:


  • Higher cost than PVC (about 30–50% more).

  • Complex production process (requires solvent recovery).

  • Poor hydrolysis resistance (especially polyester-based PU).

  • Prone to sticking at high temperatures and hardening at low temperatures.

  • Some products have DMF residues.

TPU Leather

Advantages:


  • Environmentally friendly and non-toxic (no plasticizers or halogens).

  • Excellent elasticity and abrasion resistance.

  • Good low-temperature performance (remains soft at −30℃).

  • Outstanding oil and hydrolysis resistance.

  • Can be hot-melt welded; 100% recyclable.


Disadvantages:


  • Highest raw material cost (1.5–2 times that of PU).

  • Narrow processing temperature range; difficult to control.

  • Slightly “plastic-like” feel; lower 仿真度 (simulation quality).

  • Higher cost for improved breathability versions.

  • Low market awareness.

III. Application Field Comparison

MaterialMain Application FieldsTypical Products
PVCLow-end luggage, cover binding, car floor mats, simple furnitureStudent backpacks, ID holders, cheap sofas
PUMid-to-high-end footwear, apparel, handbags, furniture, car interiorsSneaker uppers, designer bags, business sofas
TPUHigh-end outdoor gear, medical devices, electronic protectorsHiking shoes, wetsuits, phone cases, medical braces

IV. Environmental Performance Comparison

Production Process:

  • PVC: Chlorine-containing process; may produce dioxins.

  • PU: Requires DMF solvent recovery.

  • TPU: Mainly uses solvent-free processes.

Waste Disposal:

  • PVC: Difficult to degrade; incineration releases HCl.

  • PU: Partially biodegradable.

  • TPU: Thermoplastically recyclable; partially degradable.

Hazardous Substances:

  • PVC: May contain lead/cadmium stabilizers or phthalate plasticizers.

  • PU: May have DMF residues or amine catalysts.

  • TPU: Usually meets REACH and RoHS standards.

V. Development Trends

  • PVC: Shifting to lead-free calcium-zinc stabilizers and bio-based plasticizers.

  • PU: Water-based PU and solvent-free PU are key R&D focuses.

  • TPU: Market share grows as environmental demands rise.


Common trends: Bionic structures, functionalization (e.g., antibacterial, flame-retardant), and use of sustainable raw materials.


Each material has unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice depends on performance needs, cost, and environmental goals for specific applications. With technological advances, high-performance, eco-friendly synthetic leathers are closing the gap with natural leather.


(The above content is for reference only.)


Get the latest price? We will reply as soon as possible (within 12 hours)